doi:10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18097

引用本文: 宋俊清, 刘一新, 张红东. 软受限条件下嵌段共聚物薄膜缺陷消除的理论研究[J]. 高分子学报, 2018, (12): 1548-1557. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18097 shu

Citation: Jun-qing Song, Yi-xin Liu and Hong-dong Zhang. Theoretical Study on Defect Removal in Block Copolymer Thin Films under Soft Confinement[J]. Acta Polymerica Sinica, 2018, (12): 1548-1557. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18097 shu

软受限条件下嵌段共聚物薄膜缺陷消除的理论研究

聚合物分子工程国家重点实验室复旦大学高分子科学系　上海 200438

通讯作者: 刘一新, E-mail: lyx@fudan.edu.cn

基金项目: 上海市浦江人才计划(项目号 18PJ1401200)、国家自然科学基金(基金号 21004013)和国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(项目号 2011CB605701)资助

摘要: 理解缺陷消除机理对于制备无缺陷的长程有序嵌段共聚物薄膜至关重要. 本文利用弦方法结合自洽平均场理论研究了接枝均聚物高分子刷在AB两嵌段共聚物垂直层薄膜的偶极位错缺陷消除中发挥的作用. 研究发现，高分子刷的“浸润效应”和“重排效应”能够降低χ_AB的有效值，增大跳跃扩散的扩散系数，进而促进“桥连”结构的形成. 并且，接枝高分子刷的基底表面的“硬度”越小，以上2种效应越显著，越能进一步降低缺陷消除过程中形成“桥连”结构这一关键步骤的能垒.

关键词:

English

Theoretical Study on Defect Removal in Block Copolymer Thin Films under Soft Confinement

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Department of Macromolecular Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438

Corresponding author: Yi-xin Liu, E-mail: lyx@fudan.edu.cn

Received Date: 2018-03-29
Accepted Date: 2018-04-24
Available Online: 2018-12-01

Abstract: Understanding the defect removal process is crucial for the fabrication of defect-free self-assembled structures in block copolymer thin films. In this study, the removal of the dislocation dipole defect in thin films of perpendicular lamellar block copolymers on substrates modified by grafting polymers has been extensively studied. As revealed in previous studies, the " bridge” structure, which converts the slow hopping diffusion of block copolymer chains to fast interfacial diffusion, is a key factor to understand the mechanism of the defect removal process. Polymer grafting onto substrates is a widely accepted way to control domain orientation and fabricate surface pattern for directed self-assembly (DSA). However, the role of the grafted polymers on defect removal is unclear. In this study, the string method coupled with the self-consistent field theory (SCFT) is used to explore the influence of grafted polymers on the removal of a dislocation dipole in lamellar-froming thin films assembled by symmetric AB diblock copoymers. It is found that the " immersion effect” and the " rearrangement effect” introduced by the grafted polymers can facilitate the hopping diffusion of the block copolymer chains through reducing the effective χ_AB, thus making the formation of the bridge structure easier. The decrease of the softness of the brush layer (γ) will enhance these two effects and reduce the energy barrier of the transition state of the defect removal process. In the limit of γ = 0, the bridge structure is found to already exist in the dislocation dipole near the brush layer, leading to a diminishing energy barrier of the removal process. Using the symmetric PS-b-PMMA with a number-average molecular weight of ≈ 5.1 × 10⁴ at 195 °C as an example, we estimated the annealing time required to eliminate the dislocation dipole by assuming the diffusion coefficient of the hopping diffusion of block copolymers being D_⊥ ≈ 10⁻¹³ cm²/s. The annealing time are estimated to be τ = 91.4 s and 150.9 s for extremely soft confinement (γ = 0) and intermediate soft confinement (γ = 30), respectively. During the defect removal process, the brush layer will redistribute its density along the normal and the lateral directions of the substrate in response to the structural evolution of the thin film due to the " rearrangement effect”. Thus, the morphology of the brush layer reflects the microstructure of the thin film near the bottom substrate.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Matsen M W, Bates F S. Macromolecules, 1996, 29(23): 7641 − 7644
2. [2]
  Khandpur A K, Forster S, Bates F S, Hamley I W, Ryan A J, Bras W, Almdal K, Mortensen K. Macromolecules, 1995, 28(26): 8796 − 8806
3. [3]
  Xie N, Liu M J, Deng H L, Li W H, Qiu F, Shi A C. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136(8): 2974 − 2977
4. [4]
  Park C, Yoon J, Thomas E L. Polymer, 2003, 44(22): 6725 − 6760
5. [5]
  Ji S X, Wan L, Liu C C, Nealey P F. Prog Polym Sci, 2016, 54-55: 76 − 127
6. [6]
  Li W H, Muller M. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng, 2015, 6: 187 − 216
7. [7]
  Matsen M W. J Chem Phys, 1997, 106(18): 7781 − 7791
8. [8]
  Turner M S. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69(12): 1788 − 1791
9. [9]
  Walton D G, Kellogg G J, Mayes A M, Lambooy P, Russell T P. Macromolecules, 1994, 27(21): 6225 − 6228
10. [10]
  Mansky P, Liu Y, Huang E, Russell T P, Hawker C J. Science, 1997, 275(5305): 1458 − 1460
11. [11]
  Han E, Stuen K O, La Y H, Nealey P F, Gopalan P. Macromolecules, 2008, 41(23): 9090 − 9097
12. [12]
  Onses M S, Ramirez-Hernandez A, Hur S M, Sutanto E, Williamson L, Alleyne A G, Nealey P F, de Pablo J J, Rogers J A. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(7): 6606 − 6613
13. [13]
  Ruiz R, Kang H M, Detcheverry F A, Dobisz E, Kercher D S, Albrecht T R, de Pablo J J, Nealey P F. Science, 2008, 321(5891): 936 − 939
14. [14]
  Liu C C, Ramirez-Hernandez A, Han E, Craig G S W, Tada Y, Yoshida H, Kang H M, Ji S X, Gopalan P, de Pablo J J. Macromolecules, 2013, 46(4): 1415 − 1424
15. [15]
  Stoykovich M P, Muller M, Kim S O, Solak H H, Edwards E W, de Pablo J J, Nealey P F. Science, 2005, 308(5727): 1442 − 1446
16. [16]
  Bates C M, Maher M J, Janes D W, Ellison C J, Willson C G. Macromolecules, 2014, 47(1): 2 − 12
17. [17]
  Hammond M R, Cochran E, Fredrickson G H, Kramer E J. Macromolecules, 2005, 38(15): 6575 − 6585
18. [18]
  Mishra V, Fredrickson G H, Kramer E J. ACS Nano, 2012, 6(3): 2629 − 2641
19. [19]
  Nagpal U, Muller M, Nealey P F, de Pablo J J. ACS Macro Lett, 2012, 1(3): 418 − 422
20. [20]
  Li W H, Muller M. Macromolecules, 2016, 49(16): 6126 − 6138
21. [21]
  Li W H, Nealey P F, de Pablo J J, Muller M. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113(16): 168301
22. [22]
  Takahashi H, Laachi N, Delaney K T, Hur S M, Weinheimer C J, Shykind D, Fredrickson G H. Macromolecules, 2012, 45(15): 6253 − 6265
23. [23]
  Hur S M, Thapar V, Ramirez-Hernandez A, Khaira G, Segal-Peretz T, Rincon-Delgadillo P A, Li W H, Muller M, Nealey P F, de Pablo J J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112(46): 14144 − 14149
24. [24]
  Yokoyama H. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep, 2006, 53(5-6): 199 − 248
25. [25]
  Lodge T P, Dalvi M C. Phys Rev Lett, 1995, 75(4): 657 − 660
26. [26]
  Meng D, Wang Q. J Chem Phys, 2007, 126(23): 234902
27. [27]
  Trombly D M, Pryamitsyn V, Ganesan V. Macromolecules, 2011, 44(24): 9867 − 9881
28. [28]
  Trombly D M, Pryamitsyn V, Ganesan V. Phys Rev Lett, 2011, 107(14): 148304
29. [29]
  Song J Q, Liu Y X, Zhang H D. J Chem Phys, 2016, 145(21): 214902
30. [30]
  Hur S M, Khaira G S, Ramirez-Hernandez A, Muller M, Nealey P F, de Pablo J J. ACS Macro Lett, 2015, 4(1): 11 − 15
31. [31]
  Kim B H, Park S J, Jin H M, Kim J Y, Son S W, Kim M H, Koo C M, Shin J, Kim J U, Kim S O. Nano Lett, 2015, 15(2): 1190 − 1196
32. [32]
  Liu Y X, Zhang H D. J Chem Phys, 2014, 140(22): 224101
33. [33]
  Chantawansri T L, Hur S M, Garcia-Cervera C J, Ceniceros H D, Fredrickson G H. J Chem Phys, 2011, 134(24): 244905
34. [34]
  E W N, Ren W Q, Vanden-Eijnden E. J Chem Phys, 2007, 126(16): 164103
35. [35]
  E W N, Ren W Q, Vanden-Eijnden E. Phys Rev B, 2002, 66(5): 052301
36. [36]
  Tong Q Q, Sibener S J. Macromolecules, 2013, 46(21): 8538 − 8544
37. [37]
  Kim S O, Kim B H, Kim K, Koo C M, Stoykovich M P, Nealey P F, Solak H H. Macromolecules, 2006, 39(16): 5466 − 5470
38. [38]
  Kim B, Laachi N, Delaney K T, Carilli M, Kramer E J, Fredrickson G H. J Appl Polym Sci, 2014, 131(24): 40790
39. [39]
  Man X K, Zhou P, Tang J Z, Yan D D, Andelman D. Macromolecules, 2016, 49(21): 8241 − 8248
40. [40]
  Man X K, Andelman D. Phys Rev E, 2012, 86(1): 010801
41. [41]
  Cavicchi K A, Lodge T P. Macromolecules, 2004, 37(16): 6004 − 6012
42. [42]
  Harrison C, Adamson D H, Cheng Z D, Sebastian J M, Sethuraman S, Huse D A, Register R A, Chaikin P M. Science, 2000, 290(5496): 1558 − 1560
43. [43]
  Ruiz R, Sandstrom R L, Black C T. Adv Mater, 2007, 19(4): 587 − 591
1. [1]
  刘圆圆 , 唐鹤玮 , 李倩 , 王晓琳 . 嵌段共聚物规整纳米多孔薄膜的制备与形貌调控. 高分子学报, 2015, (4): 466-474. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2015.14338
2. [2]
  向略 , 朱雯 , 隆美林 , 张科 , 陈永明 . 三嵌段刷状共聚物的合成及溶液组装制备多孔纳米粒子. 高分子学报, 2018, 0(7): 917-929. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18043
3. [3]
  徐李梅 , 章林溪 . 受限于平行板中高分子刷/磁性纳米粒子体系的构象性质研究. 高分子学报, 2011, (11): 1298-1304. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2011.10347
4. [4]
  张盈 , 胡超群 , 贺小华 . 接枝树形支化分子双亲性嵌段共聚肽的合成及性能研究. 高分子学报, 2017, (2): 266-273. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2017.16220
5. [5]
  王雅卓 , 马德旺 , 赵迎春 , 明明 , 吴佳 , 丁建东 . 古紫质等光驱质子泵以及该类活性蛋白质与聚合物的功能复合材料. 高分子学报, 2012, (7): 698-713. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2012.12051
6. [6]
  常同鑫 , 赵海峰 , 黄海瑛 , 何天白 . 溶剂去除速度对于溶剂退火薄膜相形貌的影响. 高分子学报, 2016, (1): 78-84. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2016.15131
7. [7]
  卢汝烽 , 胡继文 , 张干伟 , 肖定书 . 一种以聚酰亚胺为主链的分子刷合成及表征. 高分子学报, 2012, (3): 239-249. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2012.11149
8. [8]
  王洪振 , 秦亚伟 , 董金勇 . 聚丙烯-聚磷酸酯嵌段共聚物的设计与合成. 高分子学报, 2013, (4): 518-525. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2013.12273
9. [9]
  师楠 , 张洁 , 宛新华 . 基于多酸/嵌段共聚物的刺激响应性杂化功能材料. 高分子学报, 2016, (12): 1645-1653. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2016.16265
10. [10]
  张连斌 , 王珂 , 朱锦涛 . 中国嵌段共聚物受限自组装的研究进展. 高分子学报, 2017, (8): 1261-1276. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2017.17126
11. [11]
  朱煜 , 王晓工 . 偶氮液晶嵌段共聚物自组装和光响应性研究进展. 高分子学报, 2013, (8): 962-970. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2013.13109
12. [12]
  李小霞 , 谷梦鑫 , 张良顺 , 林嘉平 . 双亲性DNA嵌段共聚物胶束构建超结构的模拟研究. 高分子学报, 2020, 51(11): 1257-1266. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2020.20078
13. [13]
  李晓露 , 王锐 , 杨春芳 , 董振峰 , 张秀芹 , 王笃金 , 王德义 . 含柔性链段聚右旋乳酸嵌段共聚物对聚左旋乳酸拉伸行为的影响. 高分子学报, 2018, 0(5): 598-606. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2017.17197
14. [14]
  秦江雷 , 陈永明 . 由嵌段共聚物制备有形状的核壳结构聚合物纳米颗粒. 高分子学报, 2011, (6): 572-585. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2011.11132
15. [15]
  刘志瑶 , 王铮 , 尹玉华 , 蒋润 , 李宝会 . 溶剂对嵌段共聚物AB/均聚物C共混体系增容效果的模拟研究. 高分子学报, 2019, 50(11): 1220-1228. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2019.19072
16. [16]
  张怀文 , 杜淼 , 王楠 , 郑强 . 拒水型有机硅改性聚氨酯嵌段共聚物的合成与表征. 高分子学报, 2013, (1): 63-69. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1105.2013.12139
17. [17]
  杨挺 , 邓鑫星 , 杜福胜 , 李子臣 . 基于含苯硼酸三嵌段共聚物的糖响应性水凝胶. 高分子学报, 2014, (11): 1553-1560. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2014.14201
18. [18]
  王英英 , 麻家妮 , 崔杰 , 韩媛媛 , 姜伟 . 球壳受限下非对称两嵌段共聚物自组装行为的Monte Carlo模拟研究. 高分子学报, 2018, 0(8): 1116-1126. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18058
19. [19]
  于春阳 , 李善龙 , 李珂 , 周永丰 . 两嵌段共聚物反相溶剂中组装结构转变动力学的模拟研究. 高分子学报, 2020, 51(3): 311-318. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2019.19173
20. [20]
  唐雯 , 岳衎 , 程正迪 . 巨型表面活性剂的本体自组装研究和分子拓扑结构效应. 高分子学报, 2018, 0(8): 959-972. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18102

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 1. Free energy difference (ΔF_d) between a dislocation dipole and perfect lamellae as a function of physical size in x direction across the layers (a), and y direction along the layers (b). The simulations are conducted in a two-dimensional AB diblock copolymer system.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 2. MEP for the transition between the defective (α = 0) and the perfect lamellae obtained using the string method associated with SCFT. No energy barrier is found along the MEP. Blue: the brush layer; red: A-rich domains; green: B-rich domains. The softness of the brush layer is γ = 0 and the length of brush chain is ϵ = 0.2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 3. Density distribution of component A in Fig. 2 as a function of the film depth parameterized by z: (a) three-dimensional morphology of the thin film; two-dimensional morphology of component A at (b) z = 0R_g, (c) z = 2.9R_g and (d) z = 3.4R_g. (e): Density distribution of A component along the yellow dotted line with different film depths. The thickness of AB block copolymer film is ${\bar \phi _{{\rm{AB}}}}d$ = 3.51R_g.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 4. Density amplitude ϕ_C,max − ϕ_C,min of grafted brush in xy plane as a function of film depth d − z from bottom substrate: (a) defect-free lamellae, (b) dislocation dipole, (c) rearrancement degree of brush ${κ} = 1/A \!\!\displaystyle\mathop {\text{\rotatebox[origin=t]{12}{\scalebox{0.95}[1]{\int}}}} \limits \!\! \sqrt {{{\left[ {{ϕ} \left( z \right) - 1} \right]}^2}} {\rm d}A$ with ${ϕ} \left( z \right) = {{ϕ} _{\rm{C}}}\left( z \right)/{\bar {ϕ} _{\rm{C}}}\left( z \right)$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 5. Responsive density rearrangement of the grafted brush by morphology of ϕ(z) with d – z = 1 R_g during the defect removal process in Fig. 2

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 6. (a) MEP for the transition between a dislocation dipole and perfert lamellae on grafted brush with different γ (The online version is colorful.); (b) Corresponding free energy difference $\Delta {f_{\rm{d}}} = {(}{{F_{\rm{d}}} - {F_{\rm{p}}}} {)}/{(}{{d}{{\bar {ϕ} }_{{\rm{AB}}}}} {)}$ ; (c) Energy barrier of the transition state over defect $\Delta {f_{\rm{b}}} = \left( {{F_{{\rm{tran}}}} - {F_{\rm{d}}}} \right)/{(} {{d}{{\bar {ϕ} }_{{\rm{AB}}}}} {)}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 7. (a) MEP for the transition between a dislocation dipole and perfert lamellae on grafted brush with different ϵ (The online version is colorful.); (b) Corresponding free energy difference Δ f_d; (c) Energy barrier Δ f _b

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Table 1. Annealing time estimated from kinetic barriers at different softness parameters for PS-b-PMMA system