高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯/共聚酯合金的制备

郭少华; 罗国君; 牛艳华; 李光宪

doi:10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2022.22124

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯/共聚酯合金的制备

研究论文 | 更新时间：2024-10-08

- 高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯/共聚酯合金的制备
- Preparation of High Strength and Super Toughness PBT/Copolyester Alloy
- 高分子学报 2022年53卷第12期页码：1504-1513
- 作者机构：
  
  1.高分子材料工程国家重点实验室四川大学高分子科学与工程学院成都 610065
  2.金发科技股份有限公司广州 511458
- 作者简介：
  
  E-mail: yhniu@scu.edu.cn;
  guanxianli@scu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金(基金号 ┣51873125;52073184);51721091┫;四川省科学技术厅科研基金(国际项目)(基金号 2019YFH0027);高校引进学科人才项目(B13040)
- DOI：10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2022.22124
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2022-12-20，
  
  网络出版日期：2022-08-30，
  
  收稿日期：2022-04-15，
  
  录用日期：2022-05-06
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郭少华,罗国君,牛艳华等.高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯/共聚酯合金的制备[J].高分子学报,2022,53(12):1504-1513.

Guo Shao-hua,Luo Guo-jun,Niu Yan-hua,et al.Preparation of High Strength and Super Toughness PBT/Copolyester Alloy[J].ACTA POLYMERICA SINICA,2022,53(12):1504-1513.
郭少华,罗国君,牛艳华等.高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯/共聚酯合金的制备[J].高分子学报,2022,53(12):1504-1513. DOI： 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2022.22124.

Guo Shao-hua,Luo Guo-jun,Niu Yan-hua,et al.Preparation of High Strength and Super Toughness PBT/Copolyester Alloy[J].ACTA POLYMERICA SINICA,2022,53(12):1504-1513. DOI： 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2022.22124.

摘要

采用熔融共混法制备了高强超韧聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯(PBT)/聚(对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯-

-对苯二甲酸-1

4-环己二醇酯)(PCTG)/甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯接枝POE(POE-

-GMA)共混物，并对其增韧机理进行了系统分析，同时利用高速相机记录了不同韧性材料的冲击行为. 扫描电子显微镜(SEM)照片显示POE-

-GMA均匀分散在体系中，粒径约为0.3 μm. PCTG和PBT具有很好的相容性，并能抑制PBT的结晶；随着PCTG含量的增加(0 wt%~40 wt%)，共混物玻璃化转变温度(

)呈线性增加，结晶度逐渐降低，但韧性增加不大. 当PCTG含量为50 wt%时，材料发生脆韧转变，缺口冲击强度达到1060 J/m，断裂伸长率达到360%，分别较未添加PCTG的样品(PBT-3E)提高了17和20倍，且拉伸强度未有明显下降(45 MPa，下降了18%). 冲击断面的微观形貌表明，在该含量下，材料发生了大量的空洞化和屈服形变. 进一步分析表明，体系中更多的可移动无定形组分(MAF)，更低的

和结晶度是材料发生脆韧转变的主要原因，而冲击瞬间产生的自发热，也进一步促进了材料屈服形变. 最后通过仪器化冲击仪和高速相机记录了材料在脆性断裂和韧性断裂2种模式下形变随时间的关系，为进一步理解材料冲击行为提供了实验依据.

Abstract

High-strength and super-toughened poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/poly(ethylene terephthalate-

-terephthalate-1

4-cyclohexanediol ester) (PCTG)/glycidyl methacrylate grafted POE (POE-

-GMA) blends were prepared by melt blending

and their toughening mechanisms were systematically analyzed. The impact behaviors of the materials with different toughness were recorded using a high-speed camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photographs showed that POE-

-GMA was uniformly dispersed in the blend with a particle size of about 0.3 μm. PCTG possesses good compatibility with PBT

and could inhibit the crystallization of PBT. With the increase of PCTG content (0 wt%-40 wt%)

the glass transition temperature (

) of the blends increased linearly and the crystallinity decreased gradually

but the toughness increases slightly. As the content of PCTG reaches 50 wt%

the brittle-ductile transition occurs

with the notch impact strength 1060 J/m and the elongation at break 360%

which is 17 and 20 times of PBT

respectively

but the tensile strength does not decrease significantly (45 MPa

decreased by 18%). The microscopic morphology of the impact fracture section shows that a large amount of cavitation and yield deformation occurred in the material at this content. Further analysis shows that more mobile amorphous fraction (MAF)

lower

and crystallinity are the main reasons for the brittle-ductile transformation

of the material

and the heat generation at the moment of impact further contributes to the yield deformation. Finally

the deformation of the material with time in both brittle fracture and ductile fracture modes was recorded by an instrumented impact tester and high-speed camera to provide an experimental basis for further understanding of the impact behavior.

关键词

聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯共聚酯高强超韧自发热冲击行为

Keywords

Poly(butylene terephthalate)CopolyesterHigh strong and super toughenessSelf-heatingImpact behavior

references

Yang H, Cho K. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010, 116(4): 1948-1957

Larocca N M, HageJr. E, Pessan L A. Polymer, 2004, 45(15): 5265-5277. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.056http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.056

Sun S L, Xu X Y, Yang H D, Zhang H X. Polymer, 2005(18), 46: 7632-7643. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.011

Aróstegui A, Nazábal J. Polym Eng Sci, 2003, 46(10): 1691-1701. doi:10.1002/pen.10143http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.10143

Wang X H, Zhang H X, Wang Z G, Jiang B Z. Polymer, 1997, 38(7): 1569-1572. doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(96)00674-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(96)00674-x

Archondouli P S, Kalfoglou N K. Polymer, 2001, 42(8): 3489-3502. doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00758-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00758-8

Savadekar N R, Jadhav K, Mali M, Mhaske S T. Int J Plast Technol, 2015, 18: 157-172. doi:10.1007/s12588-014-9087-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12588-014-9087-7

Lei Ming(雷鸣), Zou Junfeng(邹军锋), Yu Zhongzhen(于中振), Ouyang Chun(欧阳春), Yang Guisheng(杨桂生). Acta Polymerica Sinica(高分子学报), 2000, (5): 608-611. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2000.05.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2000.05.019

Wei Gang(魏刚,), Yu Yan(余燕), Huang Rui(黄锐). Acta Polymerica Sinica(高分子学报), 2006, (9): 1062-1068. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2006.09.006http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2006.09.006

Shang M Y, Cheng H L, Shentu B Q, Weng Z X. J Appl Polym Sci, 2019, 137(28): 48872-48885. doi:10.1002/app.48872http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.48872

Wu Zhenggui(吴正贵), Dong Xinyi(董新一), Dong Weifu(东为富). Acta Polymerica Sinica(高分子学报), 2021, 52(7): 734-740. doi:10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2020.20274http://dx.doi.org/10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2020.20274

Dong Lijie(董丽杰), Zhang Huixuan(张会轩), Yang Haidong(杨海东), Xiong Chuanxi(熊传溪). Acta Polymerica Sinica(高分子学报), 2003, (2): 167-170. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2003.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-3304.2003.02.002

Yan J Q, Maiti S S, Spontak R J. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2019, 7(12): 10830-10839

Kumar S, Satapathy B K. Mater Des, 2014, 62: 382-391. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.043http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.043

Fu Y, Song H H, Zhou C, Sun S L, Zhang H X. Polym Compos, 2013, 34(1): 15-21. doi:10.1002/pc.22372http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.22372

Li J L, Wang X F, Yang C J, Yang J H, Wang Y, Zhang J H. Compos Part A-Appl S, 2016, 90: 200-210. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.006

Lin G P, Lin L, Wang X L, Chen L, Wang Y Z. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2015, 54(4): 1282-1291. doi:10.1021/ie504032whttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie504032w

Lei C H, Chen D H. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008, 109(2): 1099-1104. doi:10.1002/app.28060http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.28060

Hamilton D G, Gallucci R R. J Appl Polym Sci, 1993, 48(12): 2249-2252. doi:10.1002/app.1993.070481218http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070481218

Wu J S, Mai Y W. J Mater Sci, 1993, 28(22): 6167-6177. doi:10.1007/bf00365039http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00365039

Bai H Y, Liu X Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y X. e-Polymers, 2010, 10(1): 105-120

Chen T T, Zhang J. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 437: 62-69. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.168http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.168

Chen T T, Jiang G D, Zhang J. Cryst Res Technol, 2014, 49(4): 232-243. doi:10.1002/crat.201300369http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crat.201300369

Chiu F C, Huang K H, Yang J C. J Polym Sci Polym Phys, 2003, 41(19): 2264-2274. doi:10.1002/polb.10590http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.10590

Yu Z Z, Lei M, Ou Y C, Yang G S. J Appl Polym Sci, 2003, 89(3): 797-805. doi:10.1002/app.12300http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.12300

Dupaixa R B, Boyce M C. Polymer, 2005, 46(13): 4827-4838. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.083http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.083

Saheb D N, Jog J P. J Polym Sci Polym Phys, 1999, 37(17): 2439-2444. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19990901)37:17<2439::aid-polb15>3.0.co;2-bhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19990901)37:17<2439::aid-polb15>3.0.co;2-b

Shang M Y, Wu Y J, Shentu B Q, Weng Z X. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2019, 58(28): 12650-12663. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00691http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00691

Yin L G, Shi D, Liu Y L, Yin J H. Polym Int, 2009, 58(8): 919-926. doi:10.1002/pi.2613http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.2613

Laird C, Smith G C. Phil Mag, 1962, 7(77): 847-857. doi:10.1080/14786436208212674http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786436208212674

Grellmann W, Langer B. Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of Polymer Materials. Cham: Springer, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41879-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41879-7

Bucknall C B, Paul D R. Polymer, 2013, 54(1): 320-329. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.019

Bucknall C B, Paul D R. Polymer, 2009, 50(23): 5539-5548. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.059http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.059

Loyens W, Groeninckx G. Polymer, 2003, 44(1): 123-136. doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00743-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00743-7

Yu Z Z, Yan C, Dasari A, Dai S, Mai Y W, Yang M S. Macromol Mater Eng, 2004, 289(8): 763-770. doi:10.1002/mame.200400041http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mame.200400041

Esposito A, Delpouve N, Causin V, Dhotel A, Delbreilh L, Dargent E. Macromolecules, 2016, 49(13): 4850-4861. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00384http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00384

Ma Q, Georgiev G, Cebe P. Polymer, 2011, 52(20): 4562-4570. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.006

Kolesov I, Androsch R. Polymer, 2012, 53(21): 4770-4777. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.017http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.017

Bartolotta A, Marco G D, Farsaci F, Lanza M, Pieruccini M. Polymer, 2003, 44(19): 5771-5777. doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00589-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00589-5

Cheng S Z D, Pan R, Wunderlich B. Die Makromol Chem, 1988, 189(10): 2443-2458. doi:10.1002/macp.1988.021891022http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/macp.1988.021891022

Yamauchi T. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006, 100(4): 2895-2900. doi:10.1002/app.23784http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.23784

Wang M, Liao Y, Chen D J. Polym Test, 2010, 29(6): 674-678. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.05.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.05.004

Chen Y K, Wang W T, Yuan D S, Xu C H, Cao L M, Liang X Q. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2018, 6(5): 6488-6496. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00267http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00267

Hristov V N, Lach R, Grellmann W. Polym Test, 2004, 23(5): 581-589. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.10.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.10.011

浏览量

144

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

苹果酸基脂肪共聚酯反应性共混制备超韧聚乳酸共混物

聚对苯二甲酸-2,5-呋喃二甲酸乙二醇无规共聚酯的合成与表征